Which factor would most likely influence the decision to prosecute a shoplifter?

The decision to prosecute a shoplifter is typically influenced by various factors, and having a prior history of shoplifting is a significant consideration. A repeat offender is generally seen as someone who is likely to continue engaging in theft, which could lead to more serious consequences for both the individual and the store. This history can complicate the decision-making process, as it suggests a pattern of behavior that the legal system may want to address more stringently.

Prosecutors and asset protection professionals often consider the principle of deterrence; by prosecuting individuals with a history of theft, they may be able to discourage not only that individual but others from committing similar crimes in the future. The overall goal is not just to address the specific incident at hand but to reduce future theft and protect the business.

Factors like the amount stolen or the customer’s cooperation can influence the decision as well, but they may not hold the same weight as a prior criminal history when considering prosecution. A new shopper, while potentially viewed with some leniency, does not inherently provide justification for a more favorable outcome compared to someone with a previous record, who may be perceived as a consistent threat to the store's assets.